Senate Democrats Demand Investigation Into Trump’s Ties With Binance

Senate Democrats urge federal agencies to investigate Trump’s crypto ties amid growing concerns over his financial interests and potential conflicts in cryptocurrency regulation.

Senate Democrats Demand Investigation Into Trump’s Ties With Binance. Source: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
Senate Democrats Demand Investigation Into Trump’s Ties With Binance. Source: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

US President’s financial interests are raising serious concerns among lawmakers. A group of Senate Democrats has sent a letter to the heads of the Department of Justice and the Treasury Department, expressing alarm over Donald Trump’s deepening ties with the cryptocurrency exchange Binance.

According to a Bloomberg report published May 9, the senators asked Attorney General Pam Bondi and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to provide an update on Binance’s compliance with the terms of its November settlement with US authorities. Under that agreement, Binance paid billions in penalties to the Justice Department, Treasury, and Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and CEO Changpeng Zhao, known as CZ, stepped down from his position.

Presidential Interests in the Crypto Sector

Since Trump’s victory in the most recent presidential election, many lawmakers have accused him of corruption, pointing to his personal profits from cryptocurrency while having the power to influence industry laws and regulations. Trump launched his own memecoin, which generates millions of dollars in transaction fees, and offered top token holders the chance to attend an exclusive dinner in Washington, DC. Additionally, his family-backed crypto project, World Liberty Financial, recently announced that an Abu Dhabi investment firm plans to invest a substantial sum in Binance using the USD1 stablecoin, which is associated with the Trump family.

“Our concerns about Binance’s compliance obligations are even more pressing given recent reports that the company is using the Trump family’s stablecoin to partner with foreign investment companies,” the senators wrote, as quoted by Bloomberg.

Stablecoin Bill Vote Blocked

The letter was sent less than a day after some of the same senators blocked a key vote on the GENIUS Act, a bill aimed at regulating stablecoins. Senator Elizabeth Warren, who reportedly signed the letter and opposed advancing the bill, stated that the Senate should not “enable this kind of corruption” by Trump.

Treasury Secretary Bessent commented that the Senate “missed an opportunity” by not passing the stablecoin bill but did not directly address questions about Trump’s crypto interests. It remains unclear if or when the chamber will reconsider the legislation.

Questionable Presidential Assets

A report from the nonpartisan group State Democracy Defenders Action indicated that a significant portion of Trump’s net worth is tied to cryptocurrencies. The group noted that the GENIUS Act, in its current form, would not prevent President Trump from using his executive authority to create a regulatory environment and enforcement program that prioritizes his personal enrichment over the broader interests of US stakeholders.

Amid these legislative challenges, former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao has reportedly applied for a federal pardon from Trump. Although Zhao has already served time in prison, a pardon could allow him to return to a leadership role in the crypto industry.

Ongoing Concerns Over Crypto Regulation

Trump’s influence over cryptocurrency regulation continues to raise questions among lawmakers. While the US government seeks clear rules for digital assets, the president’s personal financial interests present a clear conflict of interest. The intertwining of political power and financial gain in the rapidly evolving crypto sector is prompting calls for greater transparency and stricter oversight. Lawmakers and regulatory bodies are now under pressure to ensure that public policy decisions are made in the best interests of the country, rather than for the benefit of individual officeholders. As the debate intensifies, the outcome could have far-reaching implications for the future of digital asset regulation and the integrity of the nation’s political system.