Negotiations around stablecoin yield provisions are progressing as lawmakers prepare for a potential Senate Banking Committee markup of the Clarity Act. The White House recently shared updated legislative text with Senator Thom Tillis’s office. Meetings between Tillis, industry representatives, and administration officials have taken place in recent days.
Sources familiar with the discussions described the talks to Eleanor Terett as “moving in the right direction.” Tillis had previously been viewed as a possible holdout during earlier markup preparations. Amendments he co-sponsored with Senator Angela Alsobrooks sought to restrict the scope of stablecoin rewards issued by crypto firms.
Coinbase later cited those amendments as one reason it withdrew support for the bill. Industry groups now say revised language is being drafted to reach a compromise that both banks and crypto firms can accept.
Digital Chamber CEO Cody Carbone said, “Sen. Tillis has been very receptive to our discussions about stablecoin yield.” He added that he remains optimistic about securing a “yes” vote.
Public Debate on X Reflects Broader Market Structure Tensions
The yield discussion has also drawn attention on X, where commentators framed it as a larger battle over digital dollar control. One widely shared post stated,
“Notice how the entire debate keeps circling back to stablecoin yield. Because yield determines who captures the value of digital dollars. Banks want deposits. Crypto wants programmable money. That’s the real market structure battle.”
That comment reflects concerns that yield rules may define how stablecoins compete with traditional banking products. Industry sources said the yield issue has “taken a lot of oxygen out of the room,” leaving other parts of the bill, including DeFi provisions, with less focus.
A DeFi participant involved in negotiations said some Senate Democrats are now working to resolve remaining matters tied to decentralized platforms and ethics standards. However, yield remains the central sticking point ahead of any committee vote.
Political Friction Adds Pressure to Clarity Act Timeline
Former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci said political divisions are slowing legislative progress. During a webinar on March 4, he said crypto has become “too politicized” and that this dynamic affects the Clarity Act’s movement.
Scaramucci attributed part of the slowdown to President Donald Trump’s crypto ventures and public behavior. He stated that the President’s actions “slowed down the legislative and the regulatory process.” He also said that partisan tensions may cause some lawmakers to resist giving the administration a legislative win.
Despite this, Scaramucci predicted that Bitcoin could reach $100,000 by the end of 2026 if the Clarity Act passes. He urged investors to treat digital assets as long-term holdings.
Industry Leaders Push for Progress Before March Window
As the Coinpaper reported, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has also recently commented on the debate after President Trump urged lawmakers to act. Garlinghouse described the message as directed at those delaying the bill and said the measure concerns what is “in the best interest of the American people.”
Even if Democrats withhold support, the Clarity Act could advance along party lines in committee. However, Senator Tillis’s position remains critical if bipartisan backing does not materialize.
Industry representatives said the next three weeks will be important for resolving stablecoin reward language and related issues. If progress continues, the Senate Banking Committee could reschedule a markup later in March.
