In This Article
Staking has become a go-to strategy for crypto investors looking to earn passive income, but not all staking methods are created equal. Traditional staking locks up funds for a fixed period, while liquid staking offers flexibility by issuing tradable tokens that represent staked assets. Both have their strengths and drawbacks, so picking the right one depends on your priorities.
Traditional Staking: Stability with Limitations
Traditional staking involves locking up crypto assets to support a blockchain network. In return, stakers earn rewards based on the amount and duration of their stake. This method plays a big role in securing proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchains like Ethereum, Solana, and Polkadot.
What Traditional Staking Offers
Predictable Rewards – Staking guarantees steady returns based on the network’s reward structure.
Network Security – The staked assets help validate transactions and keep the blockchain secure.
Lower Complexity – Investors don’t need to manage extra assets or navigate DeFi protocols.
The Downsides
Locked Funds – Assets remain inaccessible until the staking period ends.
Slashing Risks – If a validator misbehaves, a portion of the staked funds may be forfeited.
Limited Flexibility – Stakers can’t use their assets in DeFi while they’re locked up.
Liquid Staking: Flexibility with Added Complexity
Liquid staking removes the biggest drawback of traditional staking—illiquidity. Instead of locking up assets, investors receive liquid staking tokens (LSTs), which can be traded or used across DeFi applications. These tokens still accrue staking rewards, making them an attractive alternative for those who want to maximize capital efficiency.
Why Investors Like Liquid Staking
Access to Liquidity – Investors can use LSTs in DeFi while still earning staking rewards.
Higher Earning Potential – LSTs can be leveraged for additional yields, such as lending or yield farming.
More Control Over Assets – No need to wait for lock-up periods to end before using funds. This evolving landscape is especially relevant for companies integrating crypto payroll, as they must navigate both staking tax policies and payroll compliance requirements.
The Risks Involved
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities – Liquid staking platforms rely on complex code, which carries risks.
Market Volatility – The value of LSTs can fluctuate, affecting returns.
Centralization Concerns – If a few platforms dominate liquid staking, decentralization could take a hit.
Staking Pools and Delegation: A Middle Ground?
For those who want the benefits of staking but are concerned about the risks of liquid staking or the inflexibility of traditional staking, staking pools offer a viable alternative. In this model, investors delegate their funds to a pool operated by a validator, earning rewards without needing to maintain their own node.
Advantages of Staking Pools
Lower Entry Barrier – Investors don’t need technical expertise to participate.
More Frequent Rewards – Some staking pools distribute rewards more frequently than direct staking.
Validator Choice – Delegators can select from different validators based on performance and fees.
However, staking pools still come with risks, including validator mismanagement or slashing penalties if the validator acts maliciously.
Tax Implications of Staking
Crypto investors often overlook the tax implications of staking. Depending on jurisdiction, staking rewards may be considered taxable income at the time they are received. Some tax authorities also classify staking rewards as capital gains when sold, leading to additional tax obligations.
What to Keep in Mind
Tax Reporting – Always track staking rewards for accurate tax filings.
Capital Gains Considerations – Selling staked rewards may trigger additional taxes.
Regulatory Uncertainty – Crypto taxation laws are evolving, so staying informed is crucial.
Consulting with a tax professional who understands cryptocurrency regulations can help investors avoid unexpected liabilities.
Choosing Between Traditional and Liquid Staking
The right staking method depends on what an investor values most. Some prefer the reliability of traditional staking, while others see the added liquidity of liquid staking as a major advantage.
First, traditional staking is a good choice for those who want a straightforward way to earn passive income without the added complexity of DeFi. It works well for investors who don’t mind locking their funds for a set period and prefer a lower-risk option that does not rely on third-party smart contracts.
Liquid staking gives investors more flexibility, but it also comes with market risks. Unlike traditional staking, where returns follow a set structure, liquid staking tokens can fluctuate in value. Take the Test Token price as an example—it shot up recently after gaining unexpected attention on social media. What started as an educational demo turned into a tradable asset overnight, with speculators piling in. While staking tokens don’t typically see that level of volatility, the way sentiment drives crypto prices is a real factor to consider. If a liquid staking token loses demand or confidence, its value could drop, and that affects overall returns.
The Future of Staking
Both staking methods have their place in crypto. Traditional staking will continue to be a reliable option for securing networks and earning passive income. At the same time, liquid staking is likely to grow, especially as DeFi expands and more investors seek capital efficiency.
A balanced strategy could involve using both methods—staking some assets traditionally for stability while using liquid staking for flexibility. Whatever route you choose, understanding the risks and benefits will help you make smarter decisions in the evolving crypto space.
