Crypto Lawyer John Deaton Says 75,000 XRP Holders Kept Ripple Alive During SEC Battle

Crypto lawyer John Deaton says the unwavering support of 75,000 XRP holders gave Ripple executives Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larsen the confidence to withstand years of pressure from the SEC lawsuit.

Source: Shutterstock
Source: Shutterstock

John Deaton Says Ripple's Survival Was Fueled by 75,000 XRP Holders 

Crypto lawyer John E. Deaton says the steadfast backing of more than 75,000 XRP holders was instrumental in helping Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse and Executive Chairman Chris Larsen withstand years of SEC pressure during the regulator's landmark lawsuit against the company.

Deaton's remarks followed Garlinghouse's recent revelation that Ripple came perilously close to collapsing after the SEC sued the company in December 2020. 

Rather than settle, Ripple chose to fight, a decision Deaton says not only delivered major legal victories but also protected hundreds of jobs and helped reshape the regulatory landscape for the U.S. crypto industry.

Deaton acknowledged that Garlinghouse and Larsen remained resilient since they didn’t give in to SEC’s intimidation tactics, arguing that Ripple's leaders refused to yield even after being sued personally. 

He also credited the more than 75,000 XRP holders who joined the case as amici curiae, calling their unprecedented participation a critical source of support that strengthened Ripple's resolve throughout the multi-year legal battle that came to a final halt in August last year.

Deaton Says SEC Targeted Ripple Executives to Force a Settlement 

Explaining why the SEC named Ripple's top executives in the lawsuit, Deaton cited comments made by former SEC Chairman Jay Clayton during a pre-lawsuit discussion with Stanford law professor Joseph A. Grundfest.

According to Deaton, Clayton acknowledged that naming executives in enforcement actions, even when fraud is not alleged, can increase pressure to settle. 

While Grundfest reportedly argued that such cases raise the government's burden of proof, Clayton maintained that the added settlement leverage often justifies the strategy.

Deaton believes Ripple became a textbook example of this approach. Although the SEC never alleged fraud, he argued the complaint was drafted in a way that resembled a fraud case, amplifying public scrutiny and damaging Ripple's reputation.

He also accused the SEC of pursuing overly aggressive litigation tactics, alleging that agency lawyers sought sweeping personal financial records from Garlinghouse, Larsen, and even members of their families despite Ripple already providing records of every XRP transaction requested. The court ultimately denied those requests.

Deaton further pointed to the SEC's conduct in the separate Debt Box case, where agency attorneys were sanctioned by a federal judge, arguing it reinforced broader concerns about the regulator's enforcement practices.

Looking back, Deaton argues the Ripple case evolved into far more than a dispute over XRP. 

In his view, it became a defining battle over regulatory overreach, one in which determined leadership, supported by more than 75,000 XRP holders, kept Ripple alive, preserved hundreds of jobs, and helped shape the future of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States.